NRF IR Repository

Male-male competition is not costly to dominant males in a cooperatively breeding bird

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nelson-Flower, MJ
dc.contributor.author Ridley, AR
dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-14T08:50:05Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-14T08:50:05Z
dc.date.copyright 2015-09-24
dc.date.issued 2015-09-24
dc.identifier.citation Nelson-Flower, MJ & Ridley, AR 2015,’ Male-male competition is not costly to dominant males in a cooperatively breeding bird’, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Vol. 69, pp. 1997-2004, Viewed 14 May 2018, Springer Verlag, DOI 10.1007/s00265-015-2011-0 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0340-5443
dc.identifier.uri https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00265-015-2011-0
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10907/1877
dc.description.abstract Male-male reproductive competition occurs in many animal societies and can be costly, both through aggression or energy expenditure prior to mating and lost paternity. In most cooperative breeders, socially dominant males breed more often than do subordinates, but the costs of pre-copulatory subordinate male reproductive competition (including unsuccessful competition) have rarely been investigated in these systems. Here, we examine the association between such competition and the fitness of dominant males in the cooperatively breeding southern pied babbler (Turdoides bicolor). Babbler groups comprise a dominant breeding pair with adult subordinates of both sexes. Roughly 35 % of adult subordinate males live in groups with unrelated adult females, but despite their common engagement in active reproductive competition, these subordinate males rarely successfully breed (extra-group mating has never been detected). Overall, active reproductive competition with subordinate males is not costly to dominant males, notwithstanding that rare episodes of breeding by subordinate males cause large paternity losses (50–100 %). Specifically, the presence of an actively competing subordinate male does not affect the proportion of successful nests, the number of fledglings fathered by the dominant male or dominant male retention of dominance to the next breeding season. Instead, dominant male breeding success is likely to be more affected by factors such as food availability and group size. In the social context of cooperative breeding, a competing subordinate male may provide benefits of a larger group size or increased help; these may offset the low risk of paternity loss, possibly promoting tolerance of reproductive competitors by dominant males. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship National Research Foundation (South Africa) en_US
dc.format.extent Fig.: ii, 8 p. en_US
dc.format.medium PDF en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Springer Verlag en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States en_US
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ en_US
dc.subject Reproductive skew en_US
dc.subject Male-male competition en_US
dc.subject Cooperative breeding en_US
dc.subject Reproductive competition en_US
dc.subject Southern pied babbler en_US
dc.subject Turdoides bicolor en_US
dc.title Male-male competition is not costly to dominant males in a cooperatively breeding bird en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Springer Verlag en_US


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States